Born to Be…What?

Bangor, Maine
Image via Wikipedia

Over the last couple weeks I read two very interesting books centered on the future of humankind and concerns of population control.  Both proposed these extremist views of birth, life and death in the wake of a post-apocalyptic Earth.

In the Handmaid’s Tale, by Maragaret Atwood, the United States has become a hyper-religious police state where women are stripped of their rights as citizens. They fit into one of four classes: a Martha (housemaid/cook), a Wife (who is typically upperclass, but sterile), a Handmaid (surrogate) and an Aunt (teaches Handmaids).  All women are forced to wear conservative clothes that are a uniform of their class, concealing individuality and their bodies — handmaids wear red.

In the novel, handmaids are treated as slutty servants or worse, as incubators.  They cannot have relationships of their own and if they interact with the husbands without the wives present, they are punished.  The handmaids are also stripped of their identity, being named Offred or Ofren depending on the name of the man they are contracted to at a given time — like Fred or Ren.

The other book I’m reading, many people read in high school.  Brave New World, by Alduous Huxley, has a quite different portrayal of the future. Where the Handmaid’s Tale is stripped of sex, but uses women’s bodies as a rape of rights, Huxley created a future of test tube babies altered in utero to fit into destined castes.

I found the juxtaposition fascinating.  Each narrative has their own precise delineation of class and gender, speaking to society’s economic and racial  divisions.  In Huxley’s world, people are made to look different and think separate thoughts — inferiority and superiority are trained mantras and biologically created. In Atwood’s account, they are later separated depending on their biology — fertile or not?

One thing both of these books share (aside from a commentary on contemporary culture) is the removal of family.  Huxley makes the idea of family a perverse and heathen ritual of the past, where the word “mother” makes people want to vomit.  For Atwood, families are ripped apart. Children are not allowed to be with their true mothers, the handmaids.  Family is a construct built to perpetuate the human population, not to nurture with love and foster a happy life.

The most significant thing I found in reading these books together, is how women’s rights are inherently linked to the survival of family and individuality.  Without equal rights, humankind is just as any other animal — reproducing, or in the case of Huxley’s novel, replicating for the sake of survival.

There is no real living. There is no love.  There is no humanity. Whether you force the burden of pregnancy and birth on a woman or take it away, either way you deny her rights.  Choice promotes individuality and family.

And, what is most ironic: American teens read these books when they are in high school. Yet, for them, the lesson doesn’t stick.  They don’t see the connection between the books, themselves and our world.  Where are the brave and new changes to feminist thought?

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Hogwarts Fashion

Potter Shades

Aside from the wizard mania of tweens dressed in capes and rugby-striped scarves at bookstore and film releases, we haven’t seen any fashion trends emerge from Harry Potter. Yeah, maybe some boys with messy hair and scars are getting more play, but they’re more bad boy than nerdy Harry.

Yet, it’s finally happened. Everyone — yes, even Mary-Kate Olsen — is wearing round glasses. From the geek chic tortoise shell frames to the wire-rimmed John Lennon style. Sorry, 80’s Ray Bans, you’ll have to stay home this summer.

The rise of these rounded specs coincides with the release of Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince, which debuts in theaters to cape-wearers on July 15. Coincidence, maybe, but I’ll go with it, otherwise I don’t get the appeal of the trend. They make people look like cartoons — or like they’re in a play. You know what I mean? How high school drama clubs have these strangely generic, yet once iconic clothes, so the characters become caricatures onstage rather than real people.

That always bugs me about theater. Speaking of, in the building where I work there are always auditions for plays each week, so I’m stuck in the elevator with all of these caricatures of people. It’s so weird. Anyway, I think a lot of this has to do with these types of generic, yet once famous trends — like Ray Bans.

Anyway, the point is, if the style of shades looked good on people, making them a more universal style like aviators, then it wouldn’t seem so weird when all of a sudden everyone started wearing them. Which, in turn, supports my theory even more. It’s been a while since the release of a Harry Potter film and many of the wand-wielding tweens who grew up with the books are too old to wear school uniforms and cast spells at the premiere; hence the round glasses, a subtle, yet magazine headline making new trend.